of Evil and
to Gods Plan
Evil was Permitted
--Right and Wrong as Principles
--The Moral Sense
--God Permitted Evil, and Will Overrule It for Good
--God not the Author of Sin
--Adam's Trial not a Farce
--His Temptation Severe
--He Sinned Wilfully
--The Penalty of Sin not Unjust, Nor Too Severe
--The Wisdom, Love and Justice Displayed
in Condemning All in Adam--
--God's Law Universal.
Why does God
Evil is that which produces unhappiness; anything which
either directly or remotely causes suffering of any kindWebster.
This subject, therefore, not only inquires regarding human ailments,
sorrows, pains, weaknesses and death, but goes back of all these to consider their primary
cause--sinand its remedy.
Since sin is the cause of evil, its removal is the only method of
permanently curing the malady.
No difficulty, perhaps, more frequently presents itself to the
inquiring mind than the questions,
Why did God
permit the present reign of evil?
Why did he permit Satan to present the temptation to our first parents,
after having created them perfect and upright?
Why did he allow the forbidden tree to have a place among the good?
Despite all attempts to turn it aside, the question will obtrude
itselfCould not God have prevented all possibility of man's fall?
of evil is designed to work out a greater good
a lasting and valuable lesson.
The difficulty undoubtedly arises from a failure to comprehend the plan of God. God could
have prevented the entrance of sin, but the fact that he did not should be sufficient
proof to us that its present permission is designed ultimately to work out some greater
good. God's plans, seen in their completeness, will prove the wisdom of the course
Could not God, with whom all things are possible, have interfered in season to prevent the
full accomplishment of Satan's design? Doubtless he could; but such interference would
have prevented the accomplishment of his own purposes.
His purpose was to make manifest
the perfection, majesty and righteous authority of his law, and to prove both to men and
to angels the evil consequences resulting from its violation. Besides, in their very
nature, some things are impossible even with God, as the Scriptures state. It is
"Impossible for God to lie." Hebrews
"He cannot deny himself." 2
He cannot do wrong, and therefore
he could not choose any but the wisest and best plan for introducing his creatures into
life, even though our short-sighted vision might for a time fail to discern the hidden
springs of infinite wisdom.
not a God that
hath pleasure in wickedness..."
The Scriptures declare that all things were created for the Lord's pleasure (Revelation
4:11)--without doubt, for the pleasure of dispensing his blessings, and of exercising the
attributes of his glorious being. And though, in the working out of his benevolent
designs, he permits evil and evildoers for a time to play an active part, yet it is not
for evil's sake, nor because he is in league with sin; for he declares that he is
"Not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness."
Though opposed to evil in every
sense, God permits (i.e., does not hinder) it for a time, because his wisdom sees a
way in which it may be made a lasting and valuable lesson to his creatures.
and "Evil" are
the results of
right and wrong principles
is a self-evident truth that for every right principle there is a corresponding wrong
principle. For instance, truth and falsity, love and hatred, justice and injustice.
We distinguish these opposite principles as right and wrong, by their
effects when put in action.
That principle the result of which, when active, is beneficial and productive of ultimate
order, harmony and happiness, we call a right principle. The opposite, which
is productive of discord, unhappiness and destruction, we call a wrong principle.
The results of these principles in
action we call good and evil. The intelligent being, capable of
discerning the right principle from the wrong, and voluntarily governed by the one or the
other, we call virtuous or sinful.
God did not
Why didnt God limit mans
faculty of discerning between right and wrong principles is called the moral sense,
or conscience. It is by this moral sense which God has given to man that we are
able to judge of God and to recognize that he is good.
It is to this moral sense that God always
appeals to prove his righteousness or justice. By the same moral sense Adam could
discern sin, or unrighteousness, to be evil, even before he knew all its
The lower orders of God's
creatures are not endowed with this moral sense. A dog has some intelligence, but not to
this degree, though he may learn that certain actions bring the approval and reward of his
master, and certain others his disapproval. He might steal or take life, but would not be
termed a sinner. Or he might protect property and life, but would not be called
virtuous--because he is ignorant of the moral quality of his actions.
God could have made mankind
devoid of ability to discern between right and wrong, or able only to discern and to do
right. But to have made him so would have been to make merely a living machine, and
certainly not a mental image of his Creator.
Or he might have made man perfect
and a free agent, as he did, and have guarded him from Satan's temptation. In that case,
man's experience being limited to good, he would have been continually liable to
suggestions of evil from without, or to ambitions from within, which would have made the
everlasting future uncertain. An outbreak of disobedience and disorder might always
have been a possibility; besides which, good would never have been so highly appreciated
except by its contrast with evil.
the exceeding sinfulness
Cain and Abel
good and evil.
is a part
God first made his creatures acquainted with good, surrounding them with it in Eden.
Afterward, as a penalty for disobedience, he gave them a severe knowledge of evil.
Expelled from Eden and deprived of fellowship
with himself, God let them experience sickness, pain and death, that they might thus
forever know evil and the inexpediency and exceeding sinfulness of sin. By a
comparison of results they came to an appreciation and proper estimate of both.
"And the Lord said, Behold, the man is become as
one of us, to know good and evil." Genesis 3:22
In this their posterity share,
except that they first obtain their knowledge of evil, and cannot fully realize what good
is until they experience it in the Millennium, as a result of their redemption by him who
will then be their Judge and King.
The moral sense, or judgment of
right and wrong, and the liberty to use it, which Adam possessed, were important features
of his likeness to God. The law of right and wrong was written in his natural
constitution. It was a part of his nature, just as it is a part of the divine nature.
But let us not forget that this image
or likeness of God, this originally law-inscribed nature of man, has lost much of its
clear outline through the erasing, degrading influence of sin. Hence it is not now
what it was in the first man.
Ability to love implies ability
to hate; hence we may reason that the Creator could not make man in his own likeness, with
power to love and to do right, without the corresponding ability to hate and to do wrong.
This liberty of choice, termed free moral agency, or free will, is a part of man's
original endowment. This, together with the full measure of his mental and moral
faculties, constituted him an image of his Creator.
Today, after six thousand years
of degradation, so much of the original likeness has been erased by sin that we are not
free, being bound, to a greater or less extent, by sin and its entailments, so that sin is
now more easy and therefore more agreeable to the fallen race than is righteousness.
obedience, rather than
ignorant, mechanical service.
That God could have given Adam such a vivid impression of the many evil results of sin as
would have deterred him from it, we need not question, but we believe that God foresaw
that an actual experience of the evil would be the surest and most lasting lesson to serve
that reason God did not prevent but permitted man to take his choice, and to feel the
consequences of evil. Had opportunity to sin never been permitted, man could not have
resisted it, consequently there would have been neither virtue nor merit in his
God seeketh such to worship him as worship in spirit and in truth.
He desires intelligent and willing obedience, rather than ignorant, mechanical service.
He already had in operation inanimate
mechanical agencies accomplishing his will, but his design was to make a nobler thing, an
intelligent creature in his own likeness, a lord for earth, whose loyalty and
righteousness would be based upon an appreciation of right and wrong, of good and evil.
The principles of right and wrong, as principles, have always existed, and must
always exist. All perfect, intelligent creatures in God's likeness must be free to
choose either, though the right principle only will forever continue to be active.
The Scriptures inform us that when the
activity of the evil principle has been permitted long enough to accomplish God's purpose,
it will forever cease to be active, and that all who continue to submit to its control
shall forever cease to exist. 1 Corinthians 15:25,26; Hebrews 2:14
Right-doing and right-doers, only,
shall continue forever.
But the question recurs in another form: Could not man have been made acquainted with evil
in some other way than by experience?
There are four ways of knowing things, namely, by intuition, by observation, by
experience, and by information received through sources accepted as positively truthful.
An intuitive knowledge would be a
direct apprehension, without the process of reasoning, or the necessity for proof. Such
knowledge belongs only to the divine Jehovah, the eternal fountain of all wisdom and
truth, who, of necessity and in the very nature of things, is superior to all his
creatures. Therefore, man's knowledge of good and evil could not be intuitive.
Man's knowledge might have come
by observation, but in that event there must needs have been some exhibition of evil and
its results for man to observe. This would imply the permission of evil somewhere, among
some beings. Why not as well among men, and upon the earth, as among others
by practical experience.
Why should not man be the illustration, and get his knowledge by practical experience? It
is so: man is gaining a practical experience, and is furnishing an illustration to others
as well, being "made a spectacle to angels."
Eve yielded to the temptation which God wisely permitted.
Eve was a transgressor.
Adam already had a knowledge of evil by information, but that was insufficient to restrain
him from trying the experiment. Adam and Eve knew God as their Creator, and hence as the
one who had the right to control and direct them; and God had said of the forbidden tree,
"In the day thou eatest thereof, dying thou shalt
They had, therefore, a
theoretical knowledge of evil, though they had never observed or experienced its effects.
Consequently, they did not appreciate their Creator's loving authority and his beneficent
law, nor the dangers from which he thereby proposed to protect them. They therefore
yielded to the temptation which God wisely permitted, the ultimate utility of which his
wisdom had traced.
Few appreciate the severity of
the temptation under which our first parents fell, nor yet the justice of God in attaching
so severe a penalty to what seems to many so slight an offense. But a little
reflection will make all plain.
The Scriptures tell the simple story of
how the woman, the weaker one, was deceived, and thus became a transgressor. Her
experience and acquaintance with God were even more limited than Adam's, for he was
created first, and God had directly communicated to him before her creation the knowledge
of the penalty of sin, while Eve probably received her information from Adam.
When she had partaken of the
fruit, she, having put confidence in Satan's deceptive misrepresentation, evidently did
not realize the extent of the transgression, though probably she had misgivings, and
slight apprehensions that all was not well. But, although deceived, Paul says she was a
transgressor though not so culpable as if she had transgressed against greater
wilfully shared Eve's act of disobedience.
Adam, we are told, unlike Eve, was not deceived. 1 Timothy 2:14 Hence he must
have transgressed with a fuller realization of the sin, and with the penalty in view,
knowing certainly that he must die. We can readily see what was the temptation which
impelled him thus recklessly to incur the pronounced penalty.
Bearing in mind that they were perfect
beings, in the mental and moral likeness of their Maker, the godlike element of love was
displayed with marked prominence by the perfect man toward his beloved companion, the
Realizing the sin and fearing Eve's
death, and thus his loss (and that without hope of recovery, for no such hope had been
given), Adam, in despair, recklessly concluded not to live without her. Deeming his own
life unhappy and worthless without her companionship, he wilfully shared her act of
disobedience in order to share the death-penalty which he probably supposed rested on her.
Both were "in the
transgression," as the Apostle shows. Romans 5:14; 1 Timothy 2:14
But Adam and Eve were one and not
"twain." Hence Eve shared the sentence which her conduct helped to bring upon
Adam. Romans 5:12,17-19
through impairment of his moral nature,
God not only foresaw that, having given man freedom of choice, he would, through lack of full
appreciation of sin and its results, accept it, but he also saw that, becoming acquainted
with it, he would still choose it, because that acquaintance would so impair his moral
nature that evil would gradually become more agreeable and more desirable to him than
Still, God designed
to permit evil, because, having the remedy provided for man's release from its
consequences, he saw that the result would be to lead him, through experience, to a full
appreciation of "the exceeding sinfulness of sin" and of the
matchless brilliancy of virtue in contrast with it--thus teaching him the more to love and
honor his Creator, who is the source and fountain of all goodness, and forever to shun
that which brought so much woe and misery.
So the final result will be
greater love for God, and greater hatred of all that is opposed to his will, and
consequently the firm establishment in everlasting righteousness of all such as shall
profit by the lessons God is now teaching through the permission of sin and correlative
but is not
the author of it.
However, a wide distinction should be observed between the indisputable fact that God has
permitted sin, and the serious error of some which charges God with being the author and
instigator of sin. The latter view is both blasphemous and contradictory to the facts
presented in the Scriptures.
Those who fall into this error generally do so in an attempt to find another plan of
salvation than that which God has provided through the sacrifice of Christ as our
If they succeed in convincing
themselves and others that God is responsible for all sin and wickedness and crime,* and
that man as an innocent tool in his hands was forced into sin, then they have cleared the
way for the theory that not a sacrifice for our sins, nor mercy in any form, was needed,
but simply and only JUSTICE.
|*Two texts of Scripture (Isaiah 45:7 and Amos 3:6)
are used to sustain this theory, but by a misinterpretation of the word evil in both
Sin is always an evil, but an
evil is not always a sin. An earthquake, a conflagration, a flood or a pestilence would be
a calamity, an evil; but none of these would be sins.
The word evil in the texts cited signifies calamities.
The same Hebrew word is translated affliction in Psalms 34:19; 107:39; Jeremiah 48:16;
It is translated trouble in Psalms
27:5; 41:1; 88:3; 107:26; Jeremiah 51:2; Lamentations 1:21.
It is translated calamities, adversity,
and distress in 1 Samuel 10:19; Psalms 10:6; 94:13; 141:5; Ecclesiastes
7:14; Nehemiah 2:17.
And the same word is in very many places rendered harm,
mischief, sore, hurt, misery, grief and sorrow.
Isaiah 45:7 and Amos 3:6 the Lord would remind Israel of his covenant made with them as a
nation. If they would obey his laws he would bless them and protect them from the
calamities common to the world in general. But that if they would forsake him he
would bring calamities (evils) upon them as chastisements.
See Deuteronomy 28:1-14,15-32; Leviticus
When calamities came upon them, however, they were inclined to consider them as accidents
and not as chastisements. Hence God sent them word through the prophets, reminding them of
their covenant and telling them that their calamities were from him and by his will for
their correction. It is absurd to use these texts to prove God the author of sin, for they
do not at all refer to sin.
noblest quality is liberty of choice.
If this were taken away, man would be inferior
Thus, too, they lay a foundation for another part of their false theory, viz.,
universalism, claiming that as God caused all the sin and wickedness and crime in all, he
will also cause the deliverance of all mankind from sin and death. And reasoning that God
willed and caused the sin, and that none could resist him, so they claim that when he
shall will righteousness all will likewise be powerless to resist him.
But in all such reasoning, man's noblest
quality, liberty of will or choice, the most striking feature of his likeness to
his Creator, is entirely set aside. Man is theoretically degraded to a mere machine which
acts only as it is acted upon.
If this were the case, man, instead of
being the lord of earth, would be inferior even to insects, for they undoubtedly have a
will or power of choice. Even the little ant has been given a power of will which man,
though by his greater power he may oppose and thwart, cannot destroy.
he fell from divine fellowship.
God did not force man
to sin, but in His loving wisdom provided
for his recovery.
God Seeks Voluntary Worship
True, God has power to force man
into either sin or righteousness, but his Word declares that he has no such purpose. He
could not consistently force man into sin for the same reason that "he cannot deny
himself." Such a course would be inconsistent with his righteous character, and
therefore an impossibility.
He seeks the worship and love of only
such as worship him in spirit and in truth. To this end he has given man a liberty of will
like unto his own, and desires him to choose righteousness. Permitting man
to choose for himself led to his fall from divine fellowship and favor and blessings, into
By his experience in sin and
death, man learns practically what God offered to teach him theoretically, without his
experiencing sin and its results. God's foreknowledge of what man would do is not used
against him, as an excuse for degrading him to a mere machine-being. On the
contrary, it is used in man's favor.
God, foreseeing the course man would
take if left free to choose for himself, did not hinder him from tasting sin and its
bitter results experimentally, but he began at once to provide a means for his recovery
from his first transgression by providing a Redeemer, a great Savior, able to save to the
uttermost all who would return unto God through him.
To this end--that man might have
a free will and yet be enabled to profit by his first failure in its misuse, in
disobedience to the Lord's will--God has provided not only a ransom for all, but
also that a knowledge of the opportunity thus offered of reconciliation with himself shall
be testified to all in due time. 1 Timothy 2:3-6
the wages of sin is death;
but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ
The severity of the penalty was not a display of hatred and malice on God's part, but the
necessary and inevitable, final result of evil, which God thus allowed man to see and
feel. God can sustain life as long as he sees fit, even against the destructive power of
It would be as impossible for God to sustain such a life everlastingly,
as it is for God to lie. That is, it is morally impossible.
Such a life could only become
more and more a source of unhappiness to itself and others. Therefore, God is too
good to sustain an existence so useless and injurious to itself and others.
His sustaining power being withdrawn,
destruction, the natural result of evil, would ensue. Life is a favor, a gift of God, and
it will be continued everlastingly only to the obedient.
a gift of God.
injustice has been done to Adam's posterity in not affording them each an individual
trial. Jehovah was in no sense bound to bring us into existence. Having brought us
into being, no law of equity or justice binds him to perpetuate our being everlastingly,
nor even to grant us a trial under promise of everlasting life if obedient. Mark this
life, which from the cradle to the tomb is but a process of dying, is, notwithstanding all
its evils and disappointments, a boon, a favor, even if there were no hereafter. The large
majority so esteem it, the exceptions (suicides) being comparatively few. These our courts
of justice have repeatedly decided to be mentally unbalanced, as otherwise they would not
thus cut themselves off from present blessings.
Besides, the conduct of the perfect
man, Adam, shows us what the conduct of his children would have been under similar
"Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh
down from the Father of Lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow
The doctrine of
2. Consistent with Gods character
3. Part of
Many have imbibed the erroneous idea that God placed our race on trial for life with the
alternative of eternal torture, whereas nothing of the kind is even hinted at in
the penalty. The favor or blessing of God to his obedient children is life--continuous
life--free from pain, sickness and every other element of decay and death.
Adam was given this blessing in the full
measure, but was warned that he would be deprived of this "gift" if he failed to
render obedience to God--
"In the day that thou eatest thereof, dying, thou
He knew nothing of a life
in torment, as the penalty of sin.
Life everlasting is nowhere
promised to any but the obedient. Life is God's gift, and death, the opposite of life, is
the penalty he prescribes.
Eternal torture is nowhere
suggested in the Old Testament Scriptures. Only a few statements in the New
Testament can be so misconstrued as to appear to teach it. These are found either
among the symbolisms of Revelation, or among the parables and dark sayings of our Lord,
which were not understood by the people who heard them (Luke 8:10), and which seem
to be but little better comprehended today.
"The wages of sin is death." Romans 6:23
"The soul that sinneth, it shall die."
|As all in
Adam shared his condemnation...
Many have supposed God unjust in allowing Adam's condemnation to be shared by his
posterity, instead of granting each one a trial and chance for everlasting life similar to
that which Adam enjoyed.
what will such say if it now be shown that the world's opportunity and trial for life will
be much more favorable than was Adam's; and that, too, because God adopted this
plan of permitting Adam's race to share his penalty in a natural way? We believe this to
be the case, and will endeavor to make it plain.
will share in restitution blessings.
God assures us that as condemnation passed upon all in Adam, so he has
arranged for a new head, father or life-giver for the race, into whom all may be
transferred by faith and obedience. That as all in Adam shared the curse of death,
so all in Christ will share the blessing of restitution, the Church being an
exception. Romans 5:12,18,19
Thus seen, the death of Jesus, the undefiled, the sinless one, was a complete settlement
toward God of the sin of Adam. As one man had sinned, and all in him had shared his curse,
his penalty, so Jesus, having paid the penalty of that one sinner, bought not only Adam,
but all his posterity--all me--who by heredity shared his weaknesses and sins and the
penalty of these--death.
purchased Adams race.
Our Lord, "the man Christ Jesus," himself unblemished, approved, and with
a perfect seed or race in him, unborn, likewise untainted with sin, gave his all of
human life and title as the full ransom-price for Adam and the race or seed in him
purchasing the lives of Adam and his race, Christ offers to adopt as his seed, his
children, all of Adam's race who will accept the terms of his New Covenant and thus by
faith and obedience come into the family of God and receive everlasting life.
Thus the Redeemer will "see
his seed [as many of Adam's seed as will accept adoption, upon his conditions] and
prolong his days [resurrection to a higher than human plane, being granted him by the
Father as a reward for his obedience]," and all in the most unlikely way; by the
sacrifice of life and posterity. And thus it is written:
"As all in Adam die, even so all in Christ
shall be made alive." Corrected translation, 1 Corinthians 15:22
"All that are in their graves...
shall come forth."
The injury we received through Adam's fall (we suffered no injustice) is, by God's favor,
to be more than offset with favor through Christ. All will sooner or later (in God's
"due time") have a full opportunity to be restored to the same
standing that Adam enjoyed before he sinned.
Those who do not receive a full knowledge and, by faith, an enjoyment of this favor of God
in the present time (and such are the great majority, including children and heathen) will
assuredly have these privileges in the next age, or "world to come,"
the dispensation or age to follow the present.
To this end,
"All that are in their graves...shall come
As each one (whether in this age or the
next) becomes fully aware of the ransom-price given by our Lord Jesus, and of his
subsequent privileges, he is considered as on trial, as Adam was. Obedience brings
lasting life, and disobedience lasting death--the "second death."
Perfect obedience, however, without
perfect ability to render it, is not required of any. Under the Covenant of Grace, members
of the Church during the Gospel age have had the righteousness of Christ imputed to them
by faith, to make up their unavoidable deficiencies through the weakness of the flesh.
Divine Grace will also operate
toward "whosoever will" of the world during the Millennial age.
Not until physical perfection is reached (which will be the privilege of all before
the close of the Millennial age) will absolute moral perfection be expected.
That new trial, the result of the
ransom and the New Covenant, will differ from the trial in Eden, in that in it the acts of
each one will affect only his own future.
|"If in this life only
we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.
"But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the
firstfruits of them that slept.
"For since by man came death, by man came also
the resurrection of the dead.
"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ
shall all be made alive."
I Corinthians 15:19-22
First Individual Opportunity
of great joy
which shall be
unto all people."
But would not this be giving some of the race a second chance to gain everlasting
We answer--The first
chance for everlasting life was lost for himself and all of his race, "yet in
his loins," by father Adam's disobedience. Under that original trial "condemnation
passed upon all men."
God's plan was that through Christ's
redemption-sacrifice Adam, and all who lost life in his failure, should, after
having tasted of the exceeding sinfulness of sin and felt the weight of sin's penalty, be
given the opportunity to turn unto God through faith in the Redeemer.
If any one chooses to call this a
"second chance," let him do so. It must certainly be Adam's second chance,
and in a sense at least it is the same for all of the redeemed race, but it will be the
first individual opportunity of his descendants, who, when born, were already under
condemnation to death.
Call it what we please, the facts are
the same. All were sentenced to death because of Adam's disobedience, and all will
enjoy (in the Millennial age) a full opportunity to gain everlasting life under the
favorable terms of the New Covenant.
This, as the angels declared, is "Good
tidings of great joy which shall be unto all people." As the Apostle declared,
this grace of God--that our Lord Jesus "gave himself a ransom for all"--must
be "testified" to all "in due time." Romans
5:17-19; 1 Timothy 2:4-6
Men, not God, have limited to the
Gospel age this chance or opportunity of attaining life. God, on the contrary, tells us
that the Gospel age is merely for the selection of the Church, the royal priesthood,
through whom, during a succeeding age, all others shall be brought to an accurate
knowledge of the truth and granted full opportunity to secure everlasting life under the
so much misery upon so many?
If given an individual chance,
how many would have been found worthy
what advantage is there in the method pursued?
Why not give all men an individual chance for life now, at once, without the long process
of Adam's trial and condemnation, the share by his offspring in his condemnation, the
redemption of all by Christ's sacrifice, and the new offer to all of everlasting life upon
the New Covenant conditions?
If evil must be permitted because
of man's free moral agency, why is its extermination accomplished by such a peculiar and
Why allow so much misery to intervene,
and to come upon many who will ultimately receive the gift of life as obedient children of
Ah! that is the point on which
interest in this subject centers. Had God ordered differently the propagation of our
species, so that children would not partake of the results of parental sins-- weaknesses,
mental, moral and physical. Had the Creator so arranged that all should have a
favorable Edenic condition for their testing, and that transgressors only should be
condemned and "cut off," how many might we presume would, under all those
favorable conditions, be found worthy, and how many unworthy of life?
If the one instance of Adam be
taken as a criterion (and he certainly was in every respect a sample of perfect manhood),
the conclusion would be that none would have been found perfectly obedient and worthy;
because none would possess that clear knowledge of and experience with God, which would
develop in them full confidence in his laws, beyond their personal judgment.
We are assured that it was Christ's
knowledge of the Father that enabled him to trust and obey implicitly. Isaiah 53:11
But let us suppose that
one-fourth would gain life; or even more, suppose that one-half were found worthy, and
that the other half would suffer the wages of sin--death. Then what?
Let us suppose the other half, the
obedient, had neither experienced nor witnessed sin. Might they not forever feel a
curiosity toward things forbidden, only restrained through fear of God and of the penalty?
Their service could not be so hearty as though they knew good and evil, and hence had a
full appreciation of the benevolent designs of the Creator in making the laws which govern
his own course as well as the course of his creatures.
Then, too, consider the half that would thus go into death as the result of their own
willful sin. They would be lastingly cut off from life, and their only hope would be that
God would in love remember them as his creatures, the work of his hands, and provide
another trial for them.
do so? The only reason would be a hope that if they were re-awakened and tried again, some
of them, by reason of their larger experience, might then choose obedience and
But even if such a plan were as
good in its results as the one God has adopted, there would be serious objections to it.
"But we had the sentence of death in
that we should not trust in ourselves,
but in God which raiseth the dead:
"Who delivered us from so great a
and doth deliver: in whom we trust that he will yet deliver us."
II Corinthians 1:9,10
wisdom of God confines sin to certain limits.
How much more like the wisdom of God to confine sin to certain limits, as his plan does.
How much better even our finite minds can
discern it to be, to have but one perfect and impartial law, which declares the wages of
willful sin to be death--destruction--cutting off from life.
God thus limits the evil which he
permits, by providing that the Millennial reign of Christ shall accomplish the full
extinction of evil and also of willful evil-doers, and usher in an eternity of
righteousness, based upon full knowledge and perfect free-will obedience by perfect
objections to giving an individual chance now:
1. Would require a
redeemer for each one condemned
2. Would not permit selection of
But there are two other objections to the plan suggested, of trying each individual
separately at first. One Redeemer was quite sufficient in the plan which God adopted,
because only one had sinned, and only one had been condemned. (Others
shared his condemnation.)
But if the first trial had been an individual trial, and if one-half of the race had
sinned and been individually condemned, it would have required the sacrifice of a redeemer
for each condemned individual.
One unforfeited life could redeem
one forfeited life, but no more. The one perfect man, "the man Christ
Jesus," who redeems the fallen Adam (and our losses through him), could not
have been "a ransom [a corresponding price] for ALL"
under any other circumstances than those of the plan which God chose.
If we should suppose the total number
of human beings since Adam to be one hundred billions, and that only one-half of these had
sinned, it would require all of the fifty billions of obedient, perfect men to die in
order to give a ransom [a corresponding price] for all the fifty billions of
So by this plan also death would pass
upon all. Such a plan would involve no less suffering than is at present
The other objection to such a plan is that it would seriously disarrange God's plans
relative to the selection and exaltation to the divine nature of a "little
flock," the body of Christ, a company of which Jesus is the Head and Lord.
God could not justly command the fifty billions
of obedient sons to give their rights, privileges and lives as ransoms for the
sinners. Under his own law their obedience would have won the right to lasting life.
Hence, if those perfect men were
asked to become ransomers of the fallen ones, it would be God's plan, as with our Lord
Jesus, to set some special reward before them, so that they, for the joy set before them,
might endure the penalty of their brethren.
If the same reward should be given them
that was given to our Lord Jesus, namely, to partake of a new nature, the divine, and to
be highly exalted above angels and principalities and powers, and every name that is
named--next to Jehovah (Ephesians 1:20,21), then there would be an immense number on the
divine plane, which the wisdom of God evidently did not approve.
Furthermore, these fifty
billions, under such circumstances, would all be on an equality, and none among
them chief or head, while the plan God has adopted calls for but one Redeemer, one
highly exalted to the divine nature, and then a "little flock" of those whom he
redeemed, and who "walk in his footsteps" of suffering and
self-denial, to share his name, his honor, his glory and his nature, even as the wife
shares with the husband.
is a solution to many perplexities.
Those who can appreciate this feature of God's plan, which, by condemning all in one
representative, opened the way for the ransom and restitution of all by one
Redeemer, will find in it the solution of many perplexities.
They will see that the condemnation of all in
one was the reverse of an injury. It was a great favor to all when taken in
connection with God's plan for providing justification for all through another
Evil will be forever extinguished
when God's purpose in permitting it shall have been accomplished, and when the benefits of
the ransom are made co-extensive with the penalty of sin.
It is impossible, however, to
appreciate rightly this feature of the plan of God without a full recognition of the
sinfulness of sin, the nature of its penalty--death, the importance and value of the ransom
which our Lord Jesus gave, and the positive and complete restoration of the individual to
favorable conditions, conditions under which he will have full and ample trial, before
being adjudged worthy of the reward (lasting life), or of the penalty (lasting death).
will result through the permission of evil.
view of the great plan of redemption, and the consequent "restitution of all
things," through Christ, we can see that blessings result through the permission
of evil which, probably, could not otherwise have been so fully realized.
be able to see clearly Gods
as shown in the
Not only are men benefited to all eternity by the experience gained, and angels by their
observation of man's experiences, but all are further advantaged by a fuller acquaintance
with God's character as manifested in his plan.
When his plan is fully accomplished, all will be able to read clearly his wisdom, justice,
love and power.
They will see the justice which could
not violate the divine decree, nor save the justly condemned race without a full
cancellation of their penalty by a willing redeemer.
They will see the love which
provided this noble sacrifice and which highly exalted the Redeemer to God's own right
hand, giving him power and authority thereby to restore to life those whom he had
purchased with his precious blood.
They will also see the power and wisdom
which were able to work out a glorious destiny for his creatures, and so to overrule every
opposing influence as to make them either the willing or the unwilling agents for the
advancement and final accomplishment of his grand designs.
Had evil not been permitted and
thus overruled by divine providence, we cannot see how these results could have been
attained. The permission of evil for a time among men thus displays a far-seeing wisdom,
which grasped all the attendant circumstances, devised the remedy, and marked the final
outcome through his power and grace.
During the Gospel dispensation sin and its attendant evils have been further made use of
for the discipline and preparation of the Church. Had sin not been permitted, the
sacrifice of our Lord Jesus and of his Church, the reward of which is the divine nature,
would have been impossible.
seems clear that substantially the same law of God which is now over mankind, obedience to
which has the reward of life, and disobedience the penalty of death, must ultimately
govern all of God's intelligent creatures. That law, as our Lord defined it, is
briefly comprehended in the one word, Love.
"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all
thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and
thy neighbor as thyself." Luke 10:27
Ultimately, when the purposes of
God shall have been accomplished. The glory of the divine character will be manifest
to all intelligent creatures.
The temporary permission of evil will
be seen by all to have been a wise feature in the divine policy. Now, this can be seen
only by the eye of faith, looking onward through God's Word at the things spoken by the
mouth of all the holy prophets since the world began--the restitution of all things.
Poor, fainting pilgrim, still hold on thy way -
The dawn is near!
True, thou art weary now;
But yon bright ray
becomes more clear.
Bear up a little longer,
wait for rest;
Yield not to slumber,
Though with toil oppressed.
The night of life is mournful,
but look on -
The dawn is near!
earth's shadowed scenes
And forms be gone;
Yield not to fear!
The mountain's summit will,
Ere long, be gained,
And the bright world of joy and peace attained.
'Joyful through hope' thy motto still must be
The dawn is near!
What glories will that dawn unfold to
Be of good cheer!
Gird up thy loins; bind sandals on thy feet.
The way is dark and long;
The end is sweet.
To Return to Home
click on Chart